×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Draft Regional Climate Action and Adaptation Plan

PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD NOW OPEN

YOUR FEEDBACK IS IMPORTANT! Share your input on the Draft RCAAP and supporting appendices during the 60-day public comment period to help shape the final version.

 

INSTRUCTIONS

1. NAVIGATE THE DOCUMENT: Use the summary feature to move through each chapter, switch between the Draft RCAAP and supporting appendicies via the drop-down menu , or use the table of contents .

2. PROVIDE FEEDBACK: Click anywhere in the document or highlight text to leave comments or questions. You can also like and view other comments.

3. ASK A QUESTION: Use the AI search tool to ask specific questions about the Draft RCAAP.

4. DOWNLOAD CHAPTERS: Click the downward arrow icon  below to download the full document. To download individual chapters or appendices, visit the DOCUMENT LIBRARY.

5. NEED HELP OR WANT TO SUBMIT COMMENTS DIRECTLY: Email rcaap@countyofnapa.org.

 

Public review period: August 1, 2025 - Septemeber 30, 2025

 

 

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…

Summary

All Hide

Napa Regional Climate Action and Adaptation Plan

Expand

Executive Summary

Get an overview of the Napa County RCAAP’s goals, key strategies, and expected outcomes. Learn about the collaborative approach and community engagement process that shaped this regional climate initiative.

Chapter 1: Introduction

Understand the climate challenges facing Napa County and why the RCAAP was created. Learn about the collaborative planning process, community engagement efforts, and the plan's commitment to advancing equity.

Chapter 2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Review Napa County’s current emissions sources and future projections that support the development of the RCAAP. See how regional reduction targets align with state goals and explore the baseline data informing the plan’s strategies.

Chapter 3: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures

Explore the RCAAP's specific actions to reduce emissions across transportation, buildings, waste, agriculture, and energy sectors. Find detailed strategies from building electrification to sustainable farming practices.

Chapter 4: Climate Change Vulnerability

Learn how climate threats will impact the county's people, infrastructure, and natural systems according to the RCAAP's assessment. Understand which hazards pose the greatest risks and why immediate action is needed.

Chapter 5: Climate Adaptation Measures

Discover how the RCAAP prepares Napa County for climate impacts through targeted adaptation strategies. Review approaches for wildfire preparedness, heat protection, flood management, and drought planning.

Chapter 6: Implementation and Monitoring

Understand how the RCAAP will be carried out, funded, and tracked over time. Learn about costs, funding strategies, monitoring protocols, and benefits for future development projects.

Chapter 7: Works Cited

Reference list of all sources and technical documents used to develop the RCAAP.

Appendices A-F

Review supporting documents with additional data, technical analyses, and reference materials that inform the strategies, measures, and actions in the Draft RCAAP.

Appendices G-K

Continue reviewing supporting documents with additional data, technical analyses, and reference materials that inform the strategies, measures, and actions in the Draft RCAAP.

Napa County RCAAP AI Assistant

Hide

Welcome to your personal Napa County RCAAP assistant.

Ask me questions about climate strategies, emissions targets, adaptation measures, implementation details, or any other aspect of the Napa County RCAAP and I'll provide answers with specific page references.

Please be patient, as responses may take a moment. Start with broad questions and follow up to request more specific information.

What would you like to know about the Napa County RCAAP?

Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


What value was selected for the 2019 level of carbon sequestration and how was it selected? The carbon sequestration inventory reported a minimum value of 5347 MTCO2e/yr to a maximum value of 1,295,292 MTCO2e/yr. In other words, what value was used to calculate when carbon neutrality is reached.
The table in chapter 3 for GHG reduction strategies and measures was in a different format, and listed individual measures. This table for climate adaptation strategies and measures follows a different format, listing the strategy in detail, with just a mention of the # of measures, but not listing measures by name. Should these two tables follow a more consistent format, that may make the information easier to visualize for the reader? These strategies and measures make up much of the document (60 pg of GHG reduction measures, 39 pages of climate adaptation measures), it would be great to more easily locate and search through both sets of strategies/ measures. Links in each table to take you to the start of each strategy, or each measure would be great.
Include partner USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Possibility to add USDA NRCS as a partner, NRCS provides financial support to farmers/ranchers to upgraded old equipment to new models with lower emissions, or go electric.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) provides financial support (through USDA Farm Bill programs) to farmers and ranchers to install carbon farming practices, and could be listed as a partner.
Suggest adding a section noting other public agencies that have played a role in this plan (NapaSan, Firewise, busses, etc)
16.4
26.8
Adjust this sentence based on corrected target numbers below.
City of American Canyon target is 16.4
City of Napa target is 26.8
Under AB 1572, it is not the governing jurisdictions that certify compliance every three years. It is all owners of affected commercial, industrial, institutional, and HOA properties with >5,000 square feet of irrigated area that directly certify compliance with the State Water Board.
To be precise in this section, AB 1572 does not require the elimination of non-functional turf. It prohibits the use of potable water for its irrigation. Therefore, areas with recycled water available may use that to irrigate. Also, non-functional turf zones containing dependent trees will likely also be allowed to continue irrigating with potable water to maintain tree health.
Yes!
Yes!
No New Housing in High Fire Zones!
Fuel Reduction = Logging?
No Logging! Keep Trees and Forests Alive!
Protect Natural Ecosystems and Wildlife.
Clear defensive areas next to houses.
No logging in non-urban areas.
No details. What specific actions will be taken in coordination?
Don't Develop Open Space.
Infill, not sprawl.
Cattle can also damage the ecosystem, and they should not be on sensitive lands. Reduce both beef consumption and methane.
YES!
Yes!
Native trees and plants helps habitat!
Construction and warehouses should use recycled water, not potable!
Stop new wineries and urban sprawl, there won't be enough water!
Can the truck refrigerators be plugged in?
Other delivery trucks, vans and cars also idle.
Wine Train, and a commuter train, from Vallejo to Calistoga.
Connect with SMART and AMTRAK, Solano transit.
ZEV express bus, shuttles, on Hwy. 29.

One problem is that Hwy. 29 has unconnected sidewalks and bikeways.
Does creating and transporting this diesel use fossil fuels?
It might be reusing bio-matter, but it's not renewable.
What are the downsides? What are the exhausts?
YES!
Should be 100% in 2025!
Hydrogen can be Explosive!
Why don't wineries reuse the water in their fields?
Why aren't they connected to wastewater now?
If the water is polluted, reduce the pollution!
Is it possible to show current land mass vs current under water?
In a keyword search, for example "ZEV", the context is shown in 3-21 with portions of the text on the left side truncated, and so the full text is not visible. Tried 3 different browsers with the same result.
Where is the key for this map? What amount of sea level rise do the different colors refer to?
Please look into Green Schoolyards America as a partner to implement this measure on our public school yards.
link
Their goal is to have 30% of the student zone shaded. Based on the CA schoolyard tree canopy equity study map on their website, all but 3 schools in Napa County currently fall below 25%, and 11 fall below 5% shaded in Napa County. Schoolyards have a large amount of open space (= great opportunity to make a difference), and a population eager to learn (=great opportunity to combine actions with education on climate resilience).
Would love to see this strategy emphasized at all locations within watershed, and include the impact it will have on other measures/ strategies. When water is channelized and leaves the watershed quickly, there is less infiltration and reduced groundwater, leading to stressed forests, less CO2 sequestration, and higher likelihood of catastrophic fire. The interconnectedness of this with several other measures in the report is not mentioned. Prioritize low-tech, green infrastructure solutions to capture and absorb rainwater, especially in the upper watershed. Start by setting goal that public buildings and schools capture runoff and send it to raingardens/ retention areas on site. Great teaching opportunity for students and public.
Within city of Napa, a significant number of cars are on the road to shuttle children to/from school every day. These vehicle miles could be avoided. Evaluate open-enrollment and bus policies?
Based on recent comments on various outlets, restriping roads and creating alternative traffic and bike lane alignments (as on 1st St and Brown's Valley Rd) is not well received by the community. A comprehensive plan to develop bike corridors on protected pathways separated from traffic is needed. Hiding bicyclists behind parked cars creates poor visibility for both bicyclists and drivers. A few E-W bicycle corridors would be beneficial to get residents from neighborhoods into central part of city of Napa, and onto vine trail. Other countries are way ahead of us in bicycle use by people of all ages, and integrate pathways into city planning. Do we also need to consider the different impact of e-bikes vs. conventional cyclists? e-bikes travel fast, and are much heavier in the event of an accident, should they be in the same bike lanes with other cyclists?
Why not include strategy to plant trees on SW side of schools and public buildings? Shade on buildings in the afternoon when cooling demand is highest reduces reliance on other energy sources for cooling. Though there is inclusion of topic urban forestry in measure AG-5, this is a simple and impactful method that you can relate to energy efficiency of existing buildings. Schools especially have significant amounts of open space around the buildings (ie. space for trees), hot blacktop, and kids/ teachers/ parents who would appreciate shade.
Does the estimate for the agricultural sector only represent emissions associated with farm equipment or does it also include carbon cycling in the soil?
I love the list and the bolded text here
Looking forward to an explanation of the change in goal to be climate neutral by 2030 to 2045 especially considering climate emergencies declared by each municipality.
Please elaborate on the “extensive” outreach:
What about emissiions from wildfires? Are they accounted for elsewhere?
Can't find the appendices. Would like to download the document as a pdf as well.
Recently, I sent Trump Administration an e-mail about Global Warming/Climate Change coming train wreck/disaster/abyss if we do not alter course off of coal burning, etc, and move to clean, green, renewable energy sources that do not add to or pump more massive amounts of carbon dioxide(a greenhouse gas) into this planet's atmosphere, than what we humans have already done. I laid out all the information for them with links to information, organizations, and people. It is not easy to think at this level of thought. I am trying to save our world/planet here. There is also link website on the internet about sea level rise in a cartoon or kid friendly format. I saw that on the NASA channel (Ch. 32) on AT&T U-verse cable TV. Even in cartoon format, I found the information relevant and easy to understand. -Matt Zax, Napa, CA
The fires' fatalities are not acknowledged.